On November 22, 2010 Attachmate announced a definitive agreement to acquire Novell, including its portfolio of PlateSpin products. Now that the acquisition is complete, new details are emerging around Attachmate's strategy with the PlateSpin portfolio of products, which Novell acquired in 2008 for $205M. It now looks like PlateSpin products are being consolidated under NetIQ.

NetIQ was acquired by Attachmate on April 27, 2006 for approximately $495 million. The company has been around since 1995, employs approximately 1000 people and has mature systems and security management product lines. PlateSpin portfolio of products is a welcome extension, especially in areas of workload migration and disaster recovery.

Novell brand has been replaced by the NetIQ brand across PlateSpin products listed on the NetIQ website:

• NetIQ PlateSpin Forge
• NetIQ PlateSpin Migrate
• NetIQ PlateSpin Orchestrate
• NetIQ PlateSpin Protect
• NetIQ PlateSpin Recon

As of today, NetIQ still contains limited information about PlateSpin products online and points to Novell's website for more information. However, it is becoming clear how Attachmate will try to maximize the synergies between NetIQ and PlateSpin product lines under a single NetIQ brand, despite the historical strength of the Novell brand. Now we just need to wait for the official press announcement.

Update (May 18, 2011)

Today NetIQ confirmed that it will add the above products as well as other Novell products to its business unit solution portfolio.

As of May 1, 2011, Novell is no longer offering the PlateSpin Recon for Assessments program to its partners.

Novell PlateSpin Recon is a good enterprise-centric offering, supporting both physical and virtual infrastructure. But unlike the Lanamark Suite Services Edition, it was not designed for solution and service delivery. To help Novell partners evaluate the benefits of using Lanamark Suite, Lanamark is offering the following promotion:

Promotion for Novell Partners
30% discount on server credits purchased prior to July 31, 2011.

Eligibility

• Novell or PlateSpin Gold or Platinum partner
• Not an existing Lanamark VAccelerate Partner
• Participation in the Novell PlateSpin Recon for Assessments program over the last 12 months

To take advantage of this promotion, please complete the Online Inquiry form with the following code in additional information: RECON

Today Lanamark announced availability of Lanamark Suite Managed Services Edition which enables IT consultants, managed service providers, system integrators and value-added resellers to offer subscription-based capacity management and optimization services. Here is a summary of the two editions:

Professional Services Edition

Lanamark Suite Professional Services Edition enables solution providers to deliver project-based assessment, planning and design services across desktops, servers and storage. It facilitates delivery of the following solutions and services:

• Application Delivery Planning
• Desktop Virtualization Planning
• Server Virtualization Planning
• Storage Optimization

Managed Services Edition

Lanamark Suite Managed Services Edition enables solution providers to deliver subscription-based capacity management and optimization services across physical and virtual infrastructure. It facilitates delivery of the following solutions and services:

• Capacity Management
• Hardware Lifecycle Management
• Continuous Server Consolidation
• Virtual Infrastructure Optimization
• Software Asset Management

Rather than resell complex capacity planning software such as Novell PlateSpin Recon, solution providers can instead deliver capacity planning and optimization as a service. This allows customers to focus on their core business rather than purchase expensive software and maintain in-house expertise for using it.

On November 3, Red Hat announced general availability of Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization for Servers. How does the server virtualization offering from Red Hat compare to the one from Oracle?

As part of the launch, Red Hat did a comparison of its virtualization offering versus ones from Microsoft and VMware. In reality, the closest competitors are actually Citrix and Oracle, especially if Citrix does indeed release Citrix XenServer as open source. This means that both Red Hat and VMware would get squeezed by

• Oracle VM and Citrix XenServer on the Linux side of server virtualization
• Microsoft Hyper-V on the Windows side of server virtualization
• Citrix and Microsoft on the Windows side of desktop virtualization

What's more interesting is that Red Hat pitches its offering for "heterogeneous servers and clouds." With a subscription-based licensing model and without a freely downloadable, re-distributable software, this strategy is going to be rather challenging to execute.

As speculation looms around plans from Citrix to release Citrix XenServer as open source, it's worthwhile to analyze how such a move would impact other leading software vendors in the virtualization space.

On February 23, 2009 Citrix announced that it will give away the full version of Citrix XenServer for free. Since Citrix is not generating any revenue from XenServer, open sourcing it seems like a logical step. But how will such a move impact the marketplace? Why would Citrix spend $500M on XenSource and then make Citrix XenServer open source?

As a Microsoft partner, Citrix understands that it's better to cooperate than to compete with the software giant, particularly in the server virtualization space. By open-sourcing Citrix XenServer, Citrix would:

1. Expand Citrix XenServer market share and drive additional revenue through virtualization management software such as Citrix Essentials.
2. Offer enterprises an open-source alternative to Microsoft Hyper-V with feature parity and high degree of interoperability.
3. Increase community-based support for development and maintenance of Citrix XenServer, rather than funding R&D completely.
4. Enhance adoption and survivability of Citrix XenServer by getting other software vendors such as Novell and Oracle to support it.

Microsoft

Microsoft benefits the most from this move because there would be an open-source server virtualization alternative that would isolate two other Linux-based virtualization platform vendors: Red Hat and VMware. In other words, Microsoft is squeezing these vendors from one side with Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 with Hyper-V and from the other side with the help of Citrix XenServer.

Novell

As a company that already has good relationships with both Citrix and Microsoft, Novell has an opportunity to provide virtualization management capabilities across these two platforms. It already does this with the PlateSpin family of products. Novell may also do a port of Citrix XenServer to Novell SUSE but this is probably not a trivial effort and would take quite a bit of time.

Oracle

Oracle VM is already based on the Xen hypervisor. Whether Oracle decides to adopt Citrix XenServer depends on whether Oracle wants to give away its intellectual property to the open source community or to build dominance in the server virtualization space on its own. However, given its active participation in the Xen community, support for open source development model and antagonism towards Red Hat, Oracle may just throw its weight behind an open source Citrix XenServer.

In a nutshell Citrix, Microsoft, Novell and Oracle have a lot to gain from an open source Citrix XenServer, while Red Hat and VMware have a lot to lose from such a move. Perhaps Citrix will also rename Citrix XenServer back to XenSource Server?!

Update (November 2, 2009)

According to an interview with Simon Crosby, CTO at Citrix, XenServer will be open-sourced but the following components will not be:

• Citrix XenCenter
• Citrix XenConvert
• Drivers for Microsoft Windows

Novell recently launched Novell PlateSpin Recon 3.7, claiming that it "...Delivers New Capacity Tool to Give Deep Insight into...Storage".

First, PlateSpin got so excited about the new capacity planning tool that it actually forgot to post the press release on its own website. However, the parent company, Novell, did the honors.

Second, there is a mention of a "new capacity tool" for storage. There is no new tool - storage planning is a feature of an existing Novell PlateSpin Recon product.

Finally, PlateSpin published a KB article stating the following limitation:

"Another exception to this function is the inability to list attached SAN disks as fiber Channel (FC) storage type for Windows 2003 server platform. This is because Windows 2003 server doesn’t have the required file (hbaapi.mof) which is responsible for identifying the disk type as FC. Therefore, in the properties of inventoried Windows 2003 server, the SAN disk type is listed incorrectly as "Local" under "Storage" tab. This file exists on Windows 2008 server."

The best part is the workaround:

"The work around to address this issue is copying this file from a Windows 2008 server to the Windows 2003 server which has attached SAN drives."

This makes users wonder what other manual work they will have to do to perform storage capacity planning.

If you are looking to get deep insight into storage infrastructure, products like Quest Storage Horizon (formerly MonoSphere) provide excellent capabilities in this space. If you are a solution provider designing storage infrastructure for virtualized environments, then the Storage Design Module in the Lanamark Suite is worth taking a look at.

After releasing PlateSpin Recon 3.6 in April, Novell announced PlateSpinRecon 3.7. The new version includes the following enhancements:

• Support for IBM AIX 5.2, 5.3 and 6.1
• Collection of additional disk performance metrics
• Identification of disk type attached to the workload (local, iSCSI, FC)

Unlike Lanamark Suite, PlateSpin Recon continues to use agents that can affect the security, performance and compliance of target systems. However, the user guide seems to contradict itself:

• PlateSpin Recon does not require the installation of agent software, eliminating the need to physically touch data center servers. All performance and inventory data is collected via standard OS instrumentation capabilities. (p. 11, 16)
• Windows: PlateSpin Recon copies an executable onto the machine being inventoried to the a directory within ADMIN$. PlateSpin Recon runs the executable through WMI or a remote service. (p. 165)
• Linux/Solaris: PlateSpin Recon uses the SCP protocol to transfer a platform-specific inventory binary and libraries to the /tmp directory of the machine being inventoried. (p. 164)

An agent, such as the one deployed by Novell PlateSpin Recon, can set off intrusion detection systems and void compliance of locked down target systems in enterprise environments. Furthermore, if a malicious third-party gains access to the host running Novell PlateSpin Recon and substitutes the executable/binary with malicious software (malware), then the malware can be launched on all systems accessed by PlateSpin Recon with administrative privileges. This single point of attack makes the enterprise particularly vulnerable to a security breach.

To avoid a slap on the wrist from customers, most solution providers would opt-in for an agent-less approach.

Alessandro Perilli wrote an interesting blog post about how Novell is moving PlateSpin Recon development to India. The PlateSpin Recon development team working on the product in Toronto, Canada is very talented and this change is not likely to be well-received by members of this team. There is also a question of how the product will be managed and how Novell is planning to channel feedback from customers and partners to the product development team.

That said, a number of virtualization companies have built phenomenal teams and products with development centers offshore. Lanamark with design and development teams in Latvia, Romania and Ukraine, Parallels with development centers in Eastern Europe and VMLogix with a stellar team in Bangalore, India are good examples of such companies.

PlateSpin will be hosting a webinar to review new capabilities in PlateSpin Recon 3.6. Here are the webinar details:

• Date: May 14, 2009
• Time: 1:00 pm EST
• Length: 1 hour

Click here to register

With VMware continuing to dominate the marketplace and other competitors emerging, Microsoft is skillfully playing virtualization chess. How can Microsoft build a dominant position in the virtualization marketplace while showing goodwill towards the Linux community and completely isolating its competitors? Here is how

1. Provide (selective) support for Linux. Novell SUSE Linux Enterprise Server is the only Linux distribution officially supported by Microsoft Hyper-V.
2. Offer an alternative virtualization platform for enterprises using Linux that is interoperable with Hyper-V. This is where Citrix XenServer comes in, partially because it provides much broader support for Linux guest operating systems.
3. Build virtualization management applications that span the two. This is where management applications such as Citrix Essentials for XenServer and Hyper-V come in. Microsoft System Center and Novell PlateSpin family of products will also provide cross-platform support.

To maximize its grip over the virtualization marketplace, Microsoft wants customers to choose between a Linux- and a Windows-based hypervisor that it endorses and supports. The strategy code looks like something this:

if customer(running primarily Windows & wants Windows-based hypervisor) then return Microsoft Hyper-V + Microsoft Windows Server

else if customer(running primarily Linux & wants Linux-based hypervisor) then return Citrix XenServer + Novell SUSE Linux Enterprise Server

else return Microsoft Hyper-V + Microsoft Windows Server

This approach gives customers choice and essentially isolates all the other Linux-based virtualization platform vendors: Red Hat, VMware, etc... This approach is also sound from an anti-trust perspective because it would ensure that Microsoft is not perceived as a monopoly in the virtualization space a few years from now.